Information Theory.
Human consciousness subsists on information therefore there exists an analytical division between the correlates of consciousness and an information theory that intersects a conscious being.

Introduction	Information	Intelligence	Knowledge	KNIT beliefs
Consciousness? IQ Knowledge Information Data Comprehension Beliefs Causation Conclusion	· Minds · Beliefs · Absolute · Known · Knoisy · The Self · Sexuality · Organization · Intelligence	Brief Elemental? Information Recognition Emancipation doubly data Talking it up.	Information Acquisition Continuous Knowing JTB Intelligence Why.	Signals Perception Data Information Knowledge Intelligence Summary Creativity Vernacular
BASE propositions	new TERMINOLOGY		KNIT axioms
P1 Claim of Existence P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P14 P15 P16 P17 P18 P19 P20 P21 P22 P23 P24 P25 P26 P27	known-in-itself knowledge-in-itself Action base Stage noise Stage view non-intentional wait states a metric		· Independent signals · A signaling base · Signal rearranging · Perception is · Data is · Physical belief · Information is · Perfect Info · Human knowing · All things Known · JTB in English · Know & Predict · Fact · Frequentation · Science divide · Intelligence · Know Intelligence · False Dichotomy · Human Truth

Knit CRITIQUE	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - introduction
Information viewed separately from any conscious act. Consciousness viewed separately from information feeding it.	Preamble. Human consciousness subsists on information therefore there exists an analytical division between the correlates of consciousness and an information theory that intersects a conscious being. Logic. One (1) proposition. P1: An Analytical division exists between consciousness and the information theory supplying information.
An Information Theory mirroring the realism of human life is the subject of this analytical presentation excluding any premises about consciousness. The referents of this theory are signals, perception, beliefs, data, information, knowledge, intelligence, and creativity.	A general Introduction, From the inception of words it could have been stated that any so called information theory would have to correspond closely to ways humans learned, communicated, achieved and produced. Words we use a lot like information, know, knowledge, data, intelligence, beliefs, would have to be allocated positions in the context space described by a complete theory. Once having said positions must be allocated, then, the natural intelligence humans possess, from where the idea of describing groups of related events as exhibiting intelligence arose, must also be an intrinsic part of the newer information theory. The proposition that our ancients made descriptions of intelligence whenever they recognized valuable improvements to the condition of life is based on an intuition that intelligence takes a position above the regular one, simply improving upon it. We will realize a criterion for adaptability is intelligence once we follow the main ideas of the theory. History has shown human progress to have been piloted by creativity using intelligence and serendipity. Logic. One (1) proposition. P2: Intelligence reflects improvements.
Should the request to discern when humans are conscious of real phenomena rather than imaginary or analytical truths drive a need for the newer information theory?	Consciousness and an information feed. In the search for the correlates of consciousness, we are required to separate the objects of which we are conscious from the mechanisms that make us conscious of them, if indeed they are physically separable within their phenomenology. Tautologically once we are conscious of something we are not-blind-to it. We need to understand like Rene Descartes, whether we are conscious of real things or imaginary ones. Je pense que je sois. Humans have a finite view of our world leading to the realization that we are conscious of a finite number of things which are known about by their regular names. What makes us primarily not-blind-to or aware of these things rests solely on an information theory, one that will not mislead us. The need for this theory is twofold, with the first task being to find a map that shows how information is transported into human consciousness and subsequent use of that information for human living. The action bases which are described further on play a crucial role in animating human life. Logic. Six (6) propositions. P3: Conscious of both real and imaginary things. P4: Know about things by their regular names. P5: Primarily aware because of incoming information. P6: Information is transported into human consciousness. P7: Information undergoes mental changes adapting for human living. P8: Two action bases exist. (A) Mental. (B) Physical.
When laying down a floor plan for intelligence based on knowledge and, what is called IQ or Intelligence Quotient, we find a human capacity to produce from an action base is required.	IQ or Intelligence. Some humans may argue that intelligence is a product of many indescribable yet finite facets of engineered human society, and by showing actual improvements to society alone, would not correctly reflect what may be termed intelligent. However improvements to a mind proposed by a method should reflect intelligence. For example a method that helps you to track the content type that occupies your thoughts which in turn helps with thought management and improves your life should be associated with intelligence. It is true there are many things whirring around in a head that goes unnoticed, many superior thoughts forgotten, when something is made better, but the average person does not have access to those head signals, except the owner/producer, and only in itz meta-descriptive form as consequential language heard in the head, making it difficult to gauge specific mental magic as intelligent. In the face of this challenge intelligence can only be recognized at the minimum, when local actions are performed. Continuing to be intelligent in a specific way must mean that the person has secured an action base of some sort, and uses that same action base when having similar experiences. Alice and Bob is such a pair greeting people everywhere they go. Humans took recourse in IQ tests to gauge how much more one person may be able to function than the other, leading to the conclusion that someone with a higher IQ would generally be able to achieve and accomplish more or with greater quality, than someone with a lower IQ score. A consequence of IQ scoring shows that people who score higher would then have access to more varieties of actions. It would not be such a difficult transition in believing that an IQ score could be linked to specific types of human performance. Logic. Three (3) propositions. P9: Without action neither knowledge nor intelligence can be noticed/observed. P10: Existence of a mental action base. P11: IQ is related to human performance.
What happens when intelligence is mixed with knowledge?	Intelligence and Knowledge Crossovers seem an important topic for our theory because knowledge could have been obtained directly through the use of intelligence and any reference from intelligence immediately disappears in favor of supporting knowledge. Examples are cars, airplanes, computer chips, organ transplants, disease control, TV shows, major league sports, schooling and guns. The follow up to this outline can only continue after the information theory has been laid out and a clearer concept of the true role intelligence plays is discovered. A preview describes intelligence as rules of organizing. Logic. Four (4) propositions. P12: After showing/using intelligence either knowledge or knowledge-in-itself comes into existence. P13: Knowledge-in-itself corresponds exactly to a fact operating under an action base, thought of as phenomenological. P14: Knowledge is a justified true belief pertaining to facts. P15: Fiction is a justified true make-belief.
Information selected for our taste from our world. The criteria shaping meaning in a worldly human context must be reflected when the extent to which the information theory will supply information is exposed.	A finite or infinite information source from our world. Our world has physical structure and a phenomenological action base that together determines the outcome of events in a finite way. Determinists hold steady on their tenant that causes determine the effects which is logically expressed as cause implies effect. To make good on our regular information theory it should be stated that a web of (asynchronous) causes may imply an effect. This given physical structure, together with, itz determining factors should be used as a guide, immediately constraining the boundaries of accessibility for the information theory, as an intrinsic reflection on the meaning it can shape and take. Logic. Two (2) propositions. P16: Cause implies belief/effect. P17: Web of causes imply belief/effect. Note: These two propositions seem to reflect actions arising from our phenomenological action base.
Should the limits of science constrain the outline of this Information Theory - as it is stated?	Science limits Information Exchange. Humans are occupied with a variety of activities on a daily basis including, experiencing sleep and wakefulness, hunger and thirst. Science has shown that what matters the most to humans are, energy, mass, space, time and the natural phenomenological action base that holds tenants like gravity, electric charge, heat and magnetism. Humans should value those phenomena, in light of their intrinsic roles! Logic. Two (2) propositions. P18: Gravity, electric charge, light, heat, muscle and magnetism participate in the phenomenological action base. P19: Energy, mass, space, time and the phenomenological action base hold primary importance for humans as life supporting phenomena.
What is mental comprehension in comparison to reality when using it to discover things about itself is the only option and how an information theory contributes to this belief in mental comprehension and the things driving it?	Mental comprehension viewed as a belief apart from consciousness. Philosophy has shown a suspected duality existing in the human brain where it intersects the services it provides that lead to human beliefs in mental comprehension as the same done with thoughts. The base belief of mental comprehension is a human thought, and human thoughts generally reflect what resides in their bearers head. Cognitive skills rely solely on conscious beliefs and the information theory. Those famous words, human belief in mental comprehension, also need explaining in terms of consciousness and not an information theory. Implicated in this information theory while being singularly derived from a consciously thought out perspective are, signals, perception, data, information, knowledge, intelligence and creativity, defining the make up of this analytical division. We acknowledge what is called creativity but will let it rest for the moment. The basis for separating consciousness, having itz own belief generating system and an information theory it serves and is served by it, is to constitute a pivot called belief which should be seen as unconsciously emerging from human brain structure, and serving the analytical purpose of possessing real qualities, be it electro-chemical variations, or one neural path on a directed neural network. Along for the analytical ride is the imaginative web of beliefs first popularized by the American philosopher Quine, but taken up here as a mathematical pseudonym to express while grounding physical quantities. Normally, when we speak about beliefs, we address the content expressly as my belief in ghosts or I believe it is a red card, but under closer examination using a philosophical microscope, that belief is supplied by consciousness because it allows you to believe, but snapped to it, within the cognitive stream, content is being supplied by an information theory because it is unconsciously producing information concerning conscious interest. Mental beliefs, which are those things our brain eventually tells us, can help us understand how the dynamics between consciousness and itz information intersect especially when we consider memories as representative encodings at the physical level and as such we can comfortably place our selection for pivot as real, valuable and meaningful. Mental beliefs of the imagination are difficult to manage because they are self-initiated, which may make your own interest in math or computers, dependent on your instructor/teacher, rather than farming or swimming. Humans should pay attention to the way information flows in this information theory, because it can help them clear space in their own minds allowing possibilities. Logic. Five (5) propositions. P20: Thoughts report on the state of selected beliefs. P21: Thoughts are the base beliefs of mental knowing. P22: Physical beliefs are the pivots for any intersection between consciousness and the new information theory. P23: Signals, perception, data, information, knowledge, intelligence and creativity are the major analytical parts of the information theory. P24: The content of the physical believing system is given by the new Information theory (KNIT).
Closing in on our information theory by the use of complete correspondence that makes the divisions as natural as possible, following scientific descriptions of the phenomenological action base.	Mental causation. Of the two forms of life we need to acknowledge so that our theory can be termed complete, one captures the external public formation of our world with its mass, energy, flux fields and forces, identified as phenomenological, whereas the other details certain beliefs of the imagination, and can be directly linked to mental brain states, like the ones knowledge or information occupy. This theory which views the phenomenological action base as responsible for physical causation also views a mental action base as responsible for mental causation. Logic. Two (2) propositions. P25: The Mental Action base is responsible for mental causation. Individual validity of an evolved mental action base is synthetic. P26: There exists a phenomenological action base supervening the mental action base which is genetic. Note: The nature of the phenomenological action base causing brain states that gives rise to the mental action base makes for an easy review of the duality of nature debate.
Concluding remarks for the Introduction.	Conclusions to the Introduction. This introduction concludes with the impression that our information theory is supported by two different action bases, the phenomenological one, described by science as flux and force fields, and the Mental action base, minimally knowing how to support counting up. Signals and Perception directly correspond to the phenomenological action base due to their need for phenomenological services. Some examples are catching a tightly spiraled football on a moonlit night and deep sea diving at anytime. Data, Information, and Knowledge, appearing as webs of various beliefs, depend on the Mental action base which is made up of Intelligence and Creativity, to be instantiated. After waking, are you ready? The main point of this theory is to make people believe that there are analytical divisions created when consciousness is separated from itz information. A presentation of the analytical divisions follows. Logic. One (1) proposition. P27: The Mental Action base with itz apriori origins, and itz synthetic subsidiaries, consist of intelligence and creativity. Note: When Kant talks about apriori, he essentially makes reference to the resident phenomenological action base and itz predetermined mental capacity (action base). This division of the mental action base is apriori, and any a posteriori activities can subsequently take place using apriori skills and building on them, creating synthetic skills.
Knit CRITIQUE	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Knit
After been given notice of what is ahead, Signals Perception Data Information Knowledge Intelligence (1) How signals carry information. (2) Creating data beliefs using perception. We are being prepared for the dissemination of incoming data.	Preamble. The information theory begins itz journey with signals, explaining how they carry information. By observation and deduction we accept that before any information gets to us humans, any apparatus would have to be not-blind-to it. The significance or meaning of blindness in this context is given by a conclusion to the proposition that signals act independently of humans. Blindness then occurs only when, it (the head process) 'cannot' re-represent the signals through perception, creating data beliefs within our heads as a direct consequence, to be processed 'later' by the mental action base. The concept of later is cleared by the human expectation! When data beliefs compound and then drawn together for matching reasons, information forms about the source of the signals. It can then be said that information concerning the source was obtained by using a web of data beliefs. Remember those same data beliefs were the ones that arrived by way of signaling. Remaining unknown at this time are the forms those data beliefs occupy
CRITIQUE	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Signaling
Why we base the theory and on what do we base it? We could imagine it would be based on something so others would find it acceptable, along with itz use as a coherent entry into the theory.	Signals. The theory proposes Signals as the basis of our informative world. If we observe the signals we give ourselves a chance to interact with the signal, itz source and subsequently decipher any possible message. Signals foreign to us may pass unnoticed. It therefore seems sane to begin constructing the outline of our perceptions from the belief that signal sensing is responsible for the effects. Examples can be taken using, seeing and light, hearing and sound, and smelling, The deduction that follows is we are deducing that perception intersects any human brain and the planetary world on a space-time diagram. So it goes that when humans say perceive they mean they are receiving the signals or some signal is getting to them.
Information is presented as a collection of related signals reflecting conditions for causes, practical effects and the passages from cause to effect. Both, Mental and Physical local actions, are implied in the treatise.	Signals and their Information. It has become known that signals carry specific information and while some signals are more loaded than others, signaling can still be seen as information transfer. It is in this context that a derivation of content is being followed in the information theory. In other words how can signals from an atom be shown to be a reflection of a state within the atom allowing us to decipher under what conditions those signals are being emitted. The idea that signals alone transferred into the brain will cause information to be available is absurd because those signals may need to be related to each other by temporal sequencing or because they were repeating entries, indicating that some additional processing is done to signal representations. Another proposition surfacing is one proposing that signals when in the brain need to be organized through further arrangements. The derivation of content would then sit on one side of the human brain as representations of signals surfacing as memories that became data beliefs about experience, alongside, some group of processing mechanisms that allow connections to be formed between those memories, tying them together, in a web like manner, causing further beliefs or a single new belief. A reference can be made to teaching modules that guide students through knowledge acquisitions as the web of belief grows, incorporating others webs of beliefs. Since any group of processing mechanisms is unknown to a mind, the brain only provides an ability to do what it does and we can only view our beliefs from what humans imaginatively construct out of them. The final appeal will be to an inferential claim which will hold weight on a correspondence basis. This means the whole information theory corresponds to what humans devised to make them as progressively successful as possible. This information theory starts by collecting signals, then arranging them into an organization which eventually reflects the construction of information as a web of causes, corresponding to both flux and stable magnitudes, but supported through an individual mental action base.
The need to understand that signals become known phenomenologically when they occur regularly rises in importance. The justification for claiming knowledge of signals is based on sane, reasonable observation. The journey of signals is a difficult one to comprehend when faced with a situation where claims of knowing some signal are made.	Signals and Knowledge. Intelligence is a successful measure of knowledge creation because to demonstrate intelligence, the proposition is, something has to be done, and what is done, is either an organizing of knowledge or a re-organizing of it. Many times what has been claimed as knowledge through the use of the word known, was actually only references to familiar phenomena, obtained when the indication, I saw or I heard, was used. It can then be said that intelligence does work with regular forms of signaling when naturally sensed. Further to this it would seem as if humans can distinguish what repeats from what is unique, For example, the first generation of central processing units, were derived from organizing knowledge, including making accurate connections. We cannot help but notice cpus came into existence through the usage of both action bases. The idea that signals will eventually need intelligence to arrange them properly after they are measured with a copy existing in the brain will be discussed in the Data section. Following the cpu example, we find that, the faster performing cpus were fabricated using methods that involved a reorganization of then current cpu knowledge. We can say, from the finite set of facts that exist, there is no known fact in existence whose state has not as yet been reorganized. Summarily, facts in their states show knowledge either as knowledge-in-itself (Fact as material existence, intersecting with the action bases.) or as an artifact of people showing what they know, and any additional fact, but not a similar fact, will indicate more public knowledge, therefore the additional knowledge would have been created anew.
Signals do carry information about your intelligence!	Signals and Intelligence. Due to newer knowledge we can arrive at the idea that intelligence must have been occupied with adding both public and private knowledge to the world, and it was through those lenses people had remarked and still make remarks on intelligence. People could be re-organizing facts in their heads all the time, refining those known intersections with the action bases, making things mentally better after they had reorganized something they did not like, or rethink, another bad choice of strategy. There will then be many people who think their claim of intelligence is noteworthy but to be recognizably intelligent, actions are necessary, leaving us to question those who claim to be really intelligent, are they under those circumstances? It is fair to say that intelligence is an organizing tool and basic intelligence is biased on: signals indicating, better or worse; more or less; larger or smaller; hotter or colder; faster or slower; harder or softer; stronger or weaker; and so on. Emotional intelligence rubs off on patience, kindness, signal awareness, responsiveness and so on. In brief, humans appreciate their information when it originates through signals as perception to data and on to information, subsequently knowledge can be demonstrated in every area, but further to this lay intelligence which subscribes only to organizing principles. There is intelligence in organizing repeating signals and later in organizing known signals. This means to show your intelligence, you have to mentally organize something then show that it works, unless you have managed to automate some sequence of actions that becomes automatic, like a crafty boxer who ducks and dodges whenever anything comes his way. If you cannot demonstrate itz validity then you may have created useless information. The more humans appreciate their information the stronger their claims can be on their beliefs. The surprising consequence of this theory shows intelligence being applicable to signals, perception, data, information and knowledge. It is indeed the superior organizing principles of certain people that make their information more acceptable allowing them to appear intelligent by the end of the process. Most examples are from history.
Abstract/Critical	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Perception
Explanation of Perception in terms of this information theory.	Perception. Perception was proposed to be the intersection between any localized human brain and itz surrounding planetary environment where transfers of information occur. The basis of a perception is a sensing module that accepts signals external to itself, and as a result, specific modules will accept certain ranges of signals. Perception operates at the signals level. It is proposed that perception can be used as an intermediate for information transfer. The following five states from (A) to (E), describe the way we can articulate the passage of a signal to a perception. Our base (A) is a purposefully or spontaneously emitted signal or any signal passing in the media that implies a true signal. Signals propagate when there are mechanisms for them to be moved in the medium. Once signals are moving in the medium there is signal transfer and with signal transfer there exists signals that can propose themselves for sensing, as noted by state (D). Any signal sensed is a perception therefore perceptions are independent of their storage and propose an internal representation based on sensing capabilities which means some of these perceptions may be fleeting. Perceptions are then being in possession of signal representations. (Note the change from noun to verb.) (A) Emitted or passing signal implies a signal. (B) Signal proposes signal transfer/propagation. (C) Signal transfer implies signal. (D) Signal proposes signal sensing/absorption. (E) Signal sensed implies perception. The phenomenological action base is responsible for all (A) thru (E), but (B) thru (D) are dissimilar to (A) and (E) which involve webs of phenomenological interactions that give the high-end functionality. Perception is a function of signal transfer because having the capacity to accommodate a particular signal means the signal type is known-in-itself to the unit. For example, if signals are transmitted in a weird space domain, then receivers that are weird space compatible will get those signals otherwise no other arrangement reflects knowledge-in-itself about the weird configuration. The very idea of being blind to something rests on an ability to perceive in the domain, and after, allowing the complete reading of a signal.
Abstract/Critical	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Data
From perceptions to data. How can that be?	Data. Data is a word grounded on a web of beliefs using a single referent belief to act in lieu of a sensible web of signal representations believed to be recurring and associated. It is difficult to know data unless you are generating signals yourself. A lot of philosophical huff exists in this data section of the information theory, due to the claim that somatic data, being data generated by the five accepted human senses is unknowable. Brains also generate data, much more than those representations somatic data utilize, but the how, when and whys are unclear. The unknowability of the real world hinges on the degree to which humans will accept their beliefs arising through the senses. However it is true that synthetic correspondence is knowable. Data can be summarized as a belief implicated within the intersection of representations, and being the belief used as a basic focal point for the web of beliefs that single belief spans. Data as a physical belief is real, being substantial. A false data belief can occur when not nearly enough representations intersect in the web making the belief of what the data represents much less accurate. For example people generally cam jump to conclusions when they have limited data or data that slightly resembles what should be the real thing. When some blank data placeholders are filled imaginatively then real mistakes begin. Complete knowledge of data is much easier with human devised machines like computers, airplanes, and cars; all deployed using human knowledge of the phenomenological action base. In the early days of car mechanics, most mechanics could tell the problem by the sound of the knocking. The knowability of synthetic correspondence. Sounds are data, organized sounds lead to musical information in the same way the spoken word sounds information content, sometimes called the expressive word. You can well imagine that the perception of sound data is done by the act of hearing. Some people consciously make distinctions between hearing and listening and you shall eventually comprehend how this becomes possible. Data certainly has to be a physical belief whether it is spurious or not. Our normal category for data is due to known signaling. When humans collect data themselves, they associate those known signals, with an onto representation, It has come to our attention that some representations can be seen as brain signals themselves. Anther belief about data is, a signal may be known, due to some trace of it remaining in the head, but it is something you may not remember, other than the signal reappearing. Data as a physical belief also serves the need of new sensations. A new sensation is any physical data not singly identified. Summarily human data is all about signal representation and recurring representations that become known only because of similar recurrence. Note should be taken that when using the word known in a human data context, itz use is not an actuation of known by knowledge but known through intermittent interaction animated by deduction. When things are known by knowledge, it corresponds to a capacity to produce local action in a world, as we shall understand as the information theory runs down to itz end.
Abstract/Critical	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Information
The synthesis of life yields information about life in various ways through many media. Where does it all begin so we can talk info please...?	Information. Actual transferences of signals through perception from representations to interpretation are processes not fully understood by humans because itz specifics are unknown. Through some sort of automation, we have all this fantastic, magical work done for us, and all we have to do is think in terms of accepting or rejecting results, learn, and then think much more. Information is the synthetic organization of Data. Most times we have to organize our mental results by thinking of those specific beliefs that should constitute information in accordance to the context. Signals from a source do relay information about the source once the signals are placed in so-called objective perspective. To place in perspective means to be able to accommodate all the pertinent beliefs into a single web of beliefs. Take a step back, constructing each connection from a single unitary belief by relating itself to the surrounding web at all intersection/cojoining, intersection/pivot points using matching or opposing specifics, and after, tying up any loose ends with criteria following directed reason, which, at a minimum does not possess discontinuities. Once a single web is constructed from the perspective, any analysis that can pivot on the web using named criteria will appear as a second view of that web also being valid, meaning it would be distinctly true.
Let us talk info please...	Information & Minds. The occurrence of minds gives rise to beliefs which in turn allows us to separate signals from their representations immediately exposing an outline of the limits that we can comprehend at this time until we include consciousness. Using consciousness we try to find out a bit more about who we are. Remember our purpose is to separate consciousness from the information theory that supports it, all in an analytic manner. So we can say we are conscious of ourselves and the knowledge we use to support our comfort zones. Our information theory we are trying to ground from a fundamental sub-atomic level up does have some blind spots, but itz conscious aspect remains finite at this time, in terms of believing there exists such an information theory. This belief is rooted in consciousness and not in the information theory until it is completed. There are many discoveries waiting to be made at the head of advancing neurological information patterns, much of which will help us reinforce ourselves as humans once those unknown expanses mentioned earlier shrink. While turning up the sound a bit, we remember sounds are data to our ears but to our conscious minds, Doh, ray, mi, fa, so, la ti, signals data that has undergone organization, resurfacing as information, based on a web of knowledge. Webs of knowledge can be used to identify complete systems. When the organization of data is known, that very organization makes it informative, whenever being presented. With this same reason in mind, it can be surmised that is why, mathematicians can look at a series of equations and read most of the embedded information those equations carry. In its simple form not rocket science by any means, since learning the forms that describe perfect world entries with their organizational limits, will yield similar results. It has been said that organizing is a rocketing science affair due to itz reliance on intelligence... This information theory describes a few empirical categories of information, depending on, as you may have guessed it, the signal type (real rocketing science) then the signal source. The analytic categories driving the synthesis of information, school knowledge and render known organizing methods that comprise intelligence.
Where does the idea of perfect information take us...?	Information & Data beliefs. Information can be comprehended as an imaginative intersection of data beliefs. Using the intersecting conditions, which can be imagined as support legs or snaps between the beliefs, such that one can say the two goes together, a web of beliefs can be used as a valid means of expression and communication describing information. It should be easy to show that a web of data beliefs would be smaller than a completed web of beliefs corresponding to information, because it takes many webs of data beliefs to fill the informational spaces. Additionally when using the snap technique, a web aggregates with each additional snap, due to moving from one to two. Perfect information corresponds to complete information patterns. In the web of beliefs that yield information, every intersection is necessary but at times there may not be enough of them, allowing us to say there are some snaps yet to be connected, and those are the only elements restraining us from completing the incoming information pattern. The closer you are to having everything snapped together, the closer you are to perfect information. Perfect sentence structure means constructing sentences using the known accepted criteria for sentences. It should be easy to show that all beliefs gathered to either qualify or quantify a single belief, must be related by necessity. For example someone doing a review of a music CD, will not count the ones and zeros from the digital tracks and compare them, because it is unnecessary although available, Having said that information exists as a web of data beliefs, a serious contender, is stepping out of the dark matter, to support information flow in a conscious human, that does not correspond to chemical imbalances in your head space. Feelings, sensations, thoughts, health and sexuality are all based on data generated by human bodies. Somatic data is delivered to the brain through any of the five human senses and it is within this category we are comfortable with using the term perception. The separation of Somatic data from Solipsist data has been lost on this generation. Information we have from the web of data beliefs generated from hearing sounds allow us to recognize words and speak them. Information concerning ourselves through thoughts should be believed to be signals flowing through the brain, so together with feelings, sensations, health, and sexuality, we can mentally perceive their specific signals, while learning about ourselves, on the way to knowing ourselves. Some of us who are minimally not psychosomatic are able to place the signals in their proper category. Signal overloading unlike signal warping is not recommended. In terms of perceptions and data within the information theory, minds are signal free beliefs because they are not perceived. As we shall comprehend, the mind is closer to natural intelligence rather than conscious beliefs, information, and knowledge.
Where does the idea of perfect information take us...?	Information & perfect information. Another signal free belief has to do with methods for the imagination and this belief remains signal free until neurological correlates are found. Abstraction then becomes a fitting example of a signal free belief because it adheres to itz criteria. Since mathematics and logic are meta-beliefs, a term designated to the use of a pure language when describing beliefs, they belong to the mental action base, where methods for the imagination exist. Meta-beliefs describe a perfect world, making all proper information from that perfect world true for that world due to the knowability of synthetic correspondence. Information can also consist of grouped beliefs and some of it could actually be bad information. For example, information could be passing through your mind about someone and some of the relations snapped together that are being used to group those beliefs are not adequately constrained or overuse of the imagination resulting with filling in too much, making you jump to conclusions, or strongly commit to one belief along with the consequences of it. The things Humans have come to know, and repeat, are unlike what it is, the rest of existence knows. To recap, in our information theory, information is an organized web of data beliefs corresponding to, signals usually reoccurring as content of the ongoing stage play, doubly directed by criteria, or beliefs reflecting the structure of any supporting infrastructure, illuminated in this case to be, the domed stage with laser lighting, and the few props alluding to a modern life, lying around. The data beliefs are said to be known once recognition occupies the place of justification when claiming knowledge as a true justified belief. However, in this information theory it is emphasized that, signals can only be known when they are created and the result checks with the prescription for the signal. Using known in the way it is used with data beliefs, approximates to, the same as knowing by frequenting, and further allowing an interpretation of the various signals, along an evolutionary scale.
Information, adds up to knowledge and information represents knowledge.	Information & Knowledge. All things known exist as information, other than those ones known-in-itself. It is the mental organization of the information directly corresponding to a web of information from the phenomenological action base that we call knowledge. The phenomenological action base is known-in-itself. When the mind becomes a phenomenon it is known-in-itself. Having said, knowledge is represented by organized information, it then implies that after closely examining our categories of information we should find all those basic forms of knowledge, humans claim to possess, because those same categories arose from their phenomenological exposure. There are four important categories with a fifth called grouped beliefs dealing exclusively with the metaphorical Cartesian stage noise, arising from a constructed theatrical stage view. Stage noise alludes to direct misinformation, lies, and misunderstandings, faulty relationships, wrong connections, all associated with legs of belief inappropriately distributed for a number of known reasons. Stage noise which may be problematic for consciousness consists mostly of an inadequate web of data beliefs (physical) unsuited to the vast field of information it should be covering, and credence could have been allotted because imagination charted the course, or plain blundering is opportune. The so-called knowledge that arises from this grouped belief category can never be demonstrated with itz deployment extant only in itz analytical analysis, together with a particular knowing about, the representative words, their catch and carry phrases meant to influence, when exchanged and explained. However a faulty demonstration can be concocted using stage noise as a grouped belief base, but it would be totally error prone, perhaps even blowing up in your face, when arranged as a plot. Empirical information leads to empirical knowledge and information from the five traditional senses arising out of somatic data, is our main source of empirical knowledge. Ice hockey, a truly phenomenological sport allows little time for reflective support from the mental action base while on the rink. The pace on the rink is faster than those normal stage view rates. Thoughts, feelings, sensations, health, and sexuality constitute another category of empirical knowledge, doling out a solipsistic challenge. It would be safe to say that those thoughts constituting mental empirical knowledge would be the ones whose form can be regularly established, exactly along the lines of accommodating those few things you know to do well. Establishing a thought and results of the thought are divided by virtue of their specific functioning. Establishing a thought is due to empirical information whereas the thought may act as a propeller to action or conversely yield empirical information, or analytical information. The empirical information of both feelings and sensations dissect their justification schema to the extent that some feelings can be intentionally caused, by having a known cause, whereas other feelings and sensations happen with their consequences only being known by recognition. The implication then implies that getting to know about oneself can be a real daunting task. Psychology plays the part of collecting empirical information in human lives regarding feelings and sensations. Learning about oneself is sensible but many times, knowledge acquisition can have risky, unknown consequences, depending on the knowledge being sought, or information thought of as real with an actual lead up to knowledge, being used as an overwhelming goal state. Some may be surprised that health information and sexual information can yield knowledge when appropriate organizing rules or principles of operation are duly applied to the information. Invalidity is knowable as mental notation, in the form of negated directed actions like don't hit, tug on, or pull me. Contrarily, validity which directs the way to continuous functioning, as a knowledge proposal must contain snaps between beliefs that are justifiable. I like it when you gaze into my eyes! People know when they are sick but it exudes betterment when organizing your daily routines in order that your health information stays at a comfortable, above and beyond being risky, level. Cooperatively, sexual information is real in the sense that it changes human behavior beginning when a human can reproduce. Knowledge from information concerning sexuality is formed when sexual stimulus is determined and the analytical regular cause and effected consequences can be relayed to be understood. It is easy but incorrect to use singular experiences to frame knowledge in the arena of sexuality. The substitution of imagination in place of doing it yields no useful knowledge. Given any proper intersection of data beliefs being snapped together by reason, and advancing itself as information in a way that the same information can be viewed as a web of beliefs held together by an organizing scheme encompassing (existing in harmony with) the information, then it can be said, and only then, that knowledge is represented by that information, surfacing due to the real quantification and relative qualification of the organization being represented as that organized web of beliefs. In this way it can be said that a string of words constitute an English sentence once an organization of English sentences completely encompasses that string of words and when someone can repeat that sequence, it can be said that they know how to compose one form of English sentences. We can understand that composing in a language is different from communicating well in that language, due to social difficulties.
Where does the idea of perfect information take us...?	Information & Intelligence. Information, arising from meta-beliefs, with itz expression at times in symbolic language completely describing a web of well formed synthetic beliefs, appearing in history as, mathematics, logic and computer programming languages, is always valid for the world it accurately describes. To fully appreciate the makeup of the following categories, people would have to think of the methods utilized instantiating them. · (A) Information tailored from conscious beliefs arising from feelings, sensations, thoughts, health, sexuality, and somatic data. · (B) Information arising from (1) the mind, one of the so-called signal-free beliefs, along with (2) methods for the imagination, and (3) abstraction. · (C) Information gathered from an intersection of beliefs. This forms with enough diverse relevant circularity, in order that many beliefs, being corroboratory, can intersect, growing at the same time, giving information because the intersection criteria are related by necessity. (A) And (B) have something to do with (C). · (D) Information from meta-beliefs such as mathematics, logic, and programming languages. · (E) Information from grouped beliefs formed from a disembodied or tangled web of beliefs leading to bad or incomplete information.
Abstract/Critical	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Knowledge
When we say we know how, what do we mean? Is it the same as when we know about something? Is having knowledge include the ability to assemble information?	Knowledge. Earlier in the presentation, the term, know, was introduced because it is used when an event repeats itself and the event is always perceived in the same manner. I know the sound of that knocking, a mechanic said to a couple while taking a drive in their car back in the early days of motoring history before computers were used to diagnose problems. He was usually right; the phenomenology of car events had remained the same throughout, specifically due to the consistencies of deterioration. Earlier, beliefs were introduced as the conscious appraisal of webs of signals, adopted from the American philosopher Quine and his web of beliefs. A single belief could then be realized as a web of other beliefs. The concept of knowledge as a justified true belief can be reworded as that which can be shown to be the case, where 'that case' takes the place of belief and 'can be shown', corresponds to the (belief in that) justification. The question then arises that this information theory has to answer, which is, do we know the world created for us, or do we only know the world we create for ourselves? It is the same as asking, whether we know the natural phenomenological world, then questioning, do we know the world of computers. Note that anything humans create, would be created using information from the natural world, and it would function under the auspices of the natural world.
When we say we know when, what do we mean? Is it the same as when we know where? Is having knowledge include the ability to disassemble motion?	Knowledge & Information. When humans use the word know, they either: · Know how · Know about, know of · Know it. · Know if, when, where, why. · Know sizes know weights. · Know cold, hunger and thirst. · Know movements know facial expressions. Additionally as seen in the information section, humans can 'know how empirically', something that football and basketball players demonstrate regularly, or as logicians they 'know how analytically'. Similarly, people can 'know about analytical objects' like algebra, or they can 'know about phenomenological experience', like sky-diving. Generally know-ifs, know-where, know-when, knowing sizes, knowing weights, knowing cold and knowing movements possess completely different webs of beliefs depending on whether it concerns phenomenology or the analytical or pure invention, due to practical considerations.. It should be easy to show that empirical justification differs from analytical justification when acquiring the ability to demonstrate knowledge on a general level. Knowledge concerns only deployable beliefs in this information theory. The idea that the world cannot be known but only information from it is obtainable and subsequently used may become another central nugget to this information theory. Another idea central to the completeness of this information theory centers on the sources of human knowledge. Empirical knowledge is derived from facts and this information theory would like to propose a fact as knowledge-in-itself, independent of human thought. We must remember knowledge is a human concept mirroring reality and consciously accessible as information. Knowledge is a special category of information whereas intelligence is an active operator on knowledge. Knowledge-in-itself is drawn together by phenomenological relationships, patterned after actual facts, and animated by phenomenological actions, consequently it is from here our copy called knowledge, is printed. After gathering ideally related information about phenomenological action, we have come about; being able to use some phenomenological actions to our benefit, and this is what is known, its production and use. It can then be said that there are some deployable beliefs, when acting as facts, does represent knowledge-in-itself, and a common example is the television. The limit of the beliefs that can be deployed corresponds to a real phenomenological limit and within an individual, his or her knowledge about phenomenology.
When we say we know after collecting information.	Knowledge by information gathering. When I know, by gathering information, I actually know about, the existence of a phenomenological event and may only think, I know how. Of those things I know how, there are some related to analytical events, some are empirical, due to direct interaction with the phenomenological external world and the rest of what I know centers around a combined interaction, a marriage of the two other modes of knowing, existing as a flow of events. It should be revealed that empirical knowledge has two faces, primarily the solipsist incarnation stemming from sensed bodily response scales, and secondly, knowing how to perform actions and gauge responses in an external world. Having introduced a term flow that corresponds to the necessity of more than one unitary event in order to produce a consequence, a correspondence can be made with a web of causes, with at least two snapped together asynchronously for good reason. The very idea of flow should bring with it, a web of beliefs that can be expressed as information. The claim is, in the combined category, there is flow between empirical knowledge and analytical knowledge. The golf swing gives such an example, and by using the perspective of a personal trainer, the example can be completed. When Alice swings her practice swings, Bob, her trainer, records them on his new computer that also captures the impact from the head of the golf club. The web of beliefs, surrounding the flow, must consist of information transfers between what is known empirically and what is known analytically. The web of beliefs the term flow brings to our theory, seems repetitive, as we follow Bob, training Alice, to adjust her golf shots, applying varying force and precise angle with some spin, using her clubs. Not to mention the golf course big screen backdrop for aim with running golf balls. Gathering information about what you are thinking can help with an analytical twist to your conscious thinking self and this is a deployable belief, which means I must possess knowledge that people can gather information about what they are thinking, and then analyze that information using thoughts, to know where they are focusing their attention. Mentally knowing where your attention is at the moment ranks within the status quo of knowledge being used as a continuous function when being alive. Deployable beliefs which are the hallmark of knowledge in this information theory are the most practical webs of beliefs that exist among all that is currently accepted as knowledge. Alongside deployable beliefs lie non-deployable beliefs that surface at the unveiling of an imaginary friend, or fictional discovery. Demonstrating, what is the case relies on quite a number of deployable beliefs.
When we say we know when, what do we mean? Is it the same as when we know where? Is having knowledge include the ability to disassemble motion?	Knowledge & knowing. Our information theory does have the ability to display the lines of demarcation between the various types of deployable beliefs. One of the more interesting questions that ask how I can deploy a belief about how my brain or part of my brain should be working will be avoided at this juncture, allowing us to focus on those beliefs that are deployable in the real external physical world. A basic natural division exists in our phenomenological world between space-time characteristics and mass-energy qualifications. The terms which have been introduced, space, time, mass and energy are presumed to be understood from a scientific explanatory perspective. As a consequence of scientific information, the deployable beliefs that can exist, are the spatially separated ones, temporally sequenced beliefs, material dependent beliefs that result from measuring mass, and phenomenological action based beliefs that result from doing work with our phenomenological base like electric charges, magnetism, muscle, radiant heat and gravity. It would be hard to imagine that heat, from itz lowly start, being ignored as a form of energy, has made an inversion to being a source of energy which is tangible to us humans, defended by the fact that, we can infer the differences various heat states impose on us. It is surprising that the scientific description of energy is the ability to do work and the work heat does, is to make us feel warmer. Other forms of energy bearing phenomena, like electric charges can overload the human capacity to bear electricity, ending in a negative result for the person, closely resembling clinical death. In a few words all masses are energy bearing quantities. Mass bears itz name because of itz stability in a gravitational field with a linear accessibility index called weight. Mass can possess net qualities that can make it available for magnetic action, electrical movements, heat absorption, and flexibility as part of the range of events mass can accommodate. In the enclosure forced by beliefs using energy as itz pivot, we find a three way split in operations. There are beliefs related to energy that is needed to act as a casual impulse or beliefs counting on energy gained as a consequence of an event. Consequently beliefs corresponding to energies released, given or lost during a web of causes do reflect reality. The third division concerns beliefs where energies are balanced, shared, exist in equilibrium or fluctuate, rising and falling about itz median value. In short, if you can believe it, all deployable beliefs are bounded by a small set of facts and ready action bases, but are susceptible to a large variety of parameterizations, including major errors or mistakes. The phenomenological action bases are magnetism, gravity, electric force, heat differentials, muscle, and the two atomic interactions, going under the names of strong interaction and weak interactions... The phenomenological action base is used by humans to progress from cause to effect, essentially making things happen in the world, while life as providence functions due to these action bases. The scientific mental synthetic action base has momentum, acceleration, and temperature, current, dt the time interval, and energy differentials as some of itz members. The mental action base for science is a planning and reflective network reflecting itz reflexivity.
The justified true belief. Why is justified such a loaded word?	Knowledge & justified true beliefs. The idea that knowledge is comported by a justified true belief has been in existence, acting as the standard test of knowledge, over our history. It has been brought into the open that using the word know, as an indication of possessing knowledge, is thrown around after justifying or reinforcing a belief through the mere casual non-intentional receipt of information. When know is used correctly any evaluation of the information containing the know clause, should intentionally evaluate to true. When you tell someone I know calculus, you should be able to demonstrate your case of knowing calculus by solving a few non-linear speed traps. Although it is true that some information will justify a belief, it is not true that the same information can justify all claims reflecting knowledge that belief may cover. When, seeing someone solve a few calculus problems completely, after the person claimed to know calculus, a belief that that person is a complete expert at calculus is unfounded. While it is true that some information will justify a belief, when theory stays in step with experiment, it means that after uncovering one quality out of an inferred combinatorial trio of qualities; no one can directly claim an existence for that trio, because the isolation of one cannot be used as evidence supporting an existence of all three. Justification as a proper representation of a verb in this information theory necessitates use of the phenomenological action base. Justification is active not passive due to itz intentionality and itz ability to show that it is the case as described.
knowledge and intelligence	Knowledge & Intelligence. To say knowledge and intelligence in one meaningful way could be construed as having successful methods to arrange and display knowledge as coherent informational segments. A brief synopsis of the knowledge section from this information theory reflects the intelligence inscribed into the production of the theory. (A) The general case of knowledge is ringed by what is called a justified true belief. (B) Knowledge-in-itself, exposed as facts and effects, is the primary source of our own body of knowledge. (C) Deployable beliefs concern both the phenomenological action base and the mental action base. (D) Demonstrating cases result from a flow of deployable beliefs. (E) Knowledge is shown using effects that take causation from the action bases (F) Legs of belief. Know how, know when, know where, know if, and know why. Known laws of the universe with no early cosmological implications. (G) A body of knowledge formed.
Abstract/Critical	NEW INFORMATION THEORY - Intelligence
Finally the positioning of intelligence in this information theory will be revealed and it is well distributed, involved in all aspects of mental health leading to cognition and itz possibilities of advancing. Rather than seeing intelligence as an action base, it can be viewed as a motivation base.	Intelligence - a briefing. Intelligence is not an analytical tool, but a phenomenological action base that delivers effects in the brain; much like heat can warm a cold heart. Since the twentieth century, while trying to analyze and complete this information theory, which is all based on human experience, my initial belief was that, there existed a stringent hierarchy starting from perceptions passing through knowledge and ending with intelligence, as an elusive ability. This thought led me to believe that the path towards intelligence would traverse information over to knowledge and subsequently intelligence would be resting above knowledge, but this layout turned out to be pedagogically incorrect. Recently I remarked on Descartes having been asked to describe his methods by the Church, them believing intelligence was in low supply. The reason for the incompleteness pivoted on a soon to be revealed point that intelligence was wrongly positioned because it was thought of as an analytical tool like knowledge and not a real impetus like heat or electric shock, The natural intellect that affects thoughts can be augmented because new knowledge reflecting an organization of itz sourced knowledge-in-itself leaving impressions in the brain, does find patterns, that can be methodical, with or without the involvement of consciousness. This path to more intelligence does beacon the idea that intelligence may be analytically sitting above knowledge, because it took knowing how, before the organizing principle was revealed.
Intelligence is about organizing principles that should predict the availability of trial and error. Intelligence has been dubbed the operator functions, performing the operations on data acting as operands.	Intelligence & Data. I am pleased to propose, at this point since previously outlining both the phenomenological action base and some mental action bases, Intelligence, being a brain based action base supporting mental causation. Intelligence can be imagined in one role as a manufacturing plant, producing specialized neurological patterns to facilitate adaptation to special internal conditions, and in doing so, exhibits the so-called neurological plasticity. Intrinsically those internal conditions would be beliefs that are analytically identifiable as operands by the stage they are in, information, perception, data, knowledge or noise (reporting can give conscious accounts). Having outlined the instantiation of a method destined to act on patterns, what needs further clarification would be intelligence is still in use when a method acts on a pattern. The two faces of intelligence have been outlined as the fabrication of a method, then the subsequent use of that method on specific types of data. It then becomes easy to show, there can exist natural apriori intelligence and developed intelligence. Methods to arrange feature patterns, methods to select whole arrangements, methods to address noise, and methods used for reporting.
Intelligence is about organizing principles that should better predict the availability of trial and error. Morality associated with intelligence is implicated after the passing of all consequences.	Intelligence & some Information. The very idea of action bases ushering action into our world from cause to effect serves as a reasonable concept when applied to the brain because, the hard evidence that humans are conscious of their thoughts cannot be denied. There is no denying that brains operate on data producing results but not all people will produce the same results from similar data. Being true, it would facilitate the concept of an analytical existence of brain operations. In the human scheme of things, someone who continually produces correct results, using their own brain processes, from all data samples is very intelligent, and of course, the term, knowledgeable comes with that same territory. Furthermore, intelligence is a word, used to describe the assessment of an identifiable action someone, their self had performed. In brief, the correlates of intelligence are methods manipulating regular known data, corresponding to knowledge of something, including knowledge by frequentation of some other thing that may be grounded on a small web of beliefs. Methods can be learned that are not natural measures like liking people, but are analytical relations between correctly connected information, and can be featured as manipulations of the metric momentum, any other metric, or a regular valuation scheme. Some of the naturally fabricated apriori base methods to fit this information theory would be bigger, larger, heavier, warmer, softer, stronger, healthier, more active, and each with itz scalar opposite. It is easy to mouth these words, but the how to manual was not always that obvious. Repeating, yes it was difficult, for effect. Technically the term organizing principles apply to intelligence and there are no specific moral connotations. The search for general intelligence is on, and it has been on since this information theory had discovered a way to that goal. The differences between the various forms of life on Earth are vast with humans occupying the premier position on the list of most adaptive species. Human adaptability has been attributed directly to their intelligent behaviors, now being abbreviated under the heading of intentional human actions. I would hope all readers can comprehend how, adaptability fits within information based world and additionally what it takes to properly accommodate any alteration to information, initially appearing as noise. The corresponding method that serves the changed information must also interact and hopefully after what remains is just one complimentary method and not two contradictory approaches. Intelligence is proposed to be taking care of these transitions out of noise, however we should notice carefully that without notification of changes, older methods will fail causing unknown results mostly damage, shame or disgrace. One of the greatest benefits of intelligence in our world was miniaturization and aggrandizing which I believe resulted from phenomenological information, and efficiency that resulted from the human analytical action information base. Windmills, micro chips, walls, and unfortunately guns can be named as examples of human intelligence.
Intelligence is all about organizing principles that additionally should predict the availability of trial and error.	Intelligence & itz knowledge. There are a few categories of organizing principles. Energetic constraints where some form of work is being done with entropy being assigned a real value, does hold primary importance in human valuation schemes, at times rising in intensity showing up as hunger, thirst and loneliness. Then, comes intelligence handling temporal interactions, causing wait states to be shortened, lengthened or immortalized. If you can immediately connect what it takes to organize a system temporally, that is being in control of the meta-belief, dt as it approaches itz upper or lower limit, within that system, to intelligence, then you could say you know, what intelligence is. Further to this you should be able to claim an ability to collect knowledge about intelligence, and when done, a growth in intelligence can be remarked upon itz thought. Some may add that it may be wiser to consider lowering dt, unless it had become a measure of useful tolerance. Be assured that massive material dependencies and their manipulations are also directly linked to intelligence. The mystique of material substance once supported by unknown properties is now manipulable because of knowledge gathered and the organizing techniques (therein found and) appropriated or developed to make/constitute alterations that reflect scalars like change in volume, dv, resistance to electric current R, and many others, is the identity of intelligence. Following all those categories closely are live human beings still struggling with their own informational content, supporting another category. Humans show their personal independent intelligence by being healthier, more hygienic, more emotional, less emotional, more active, less active, more knowledgeable, and more comfortable, In a sense IQ tests done today reflect the more knowledgeable aspect of intelligence rather than being less knowledgeable but only in a few areas and most of it is analytical or mixed with phenomenological base beliefs, like word games. None of the human IQ tests seem to involve emotions, health, and hygiene nor did activities, leaving us with a clear idea what was/is being tested.
Intelligence can provide new knowledge...	Intelligence & more knowledge. In the realm of temporal interactions, what this information theory calls the intelligent operators, are earlier and later, faster and slower, then finally discrete versus continuous. When energetic dependencies are considered then what become the intelligent operators are efficiency and temporal duration or the waiting state. Within the category of material constraints more intelligent operators that surface are larger and smaller, stronger and weaker, robustness, and functionality. The subjective dependency of functionality makes some forms of intelligence harder to surface in a collective reality, unless it is a roast. In the personal human world, health, emotions, hygiene, activity, and comfort play major intrinsic roles, while knowledge plays a public extrinsic role, Our Intelligence as a species can now be refined since it is now less vague under this information theory. This information theory predicts that people can learn to support a moderate IQ in the traditional sense and expand their own interpretations of individual human intelligence, as long as any belief held will hold sway in the world, or can be falsified. It has been revealed that the intelligence of which we speak is viewed differently from the intelligence doing the work or producing results. Intelligence which is shown when organizing knowledge, is itself geared to arrange. In this information theory natural boundaries corresponding to data divisions are followed to such an extent that the methods needed to pattern the issues are easily categorized, and these categories follow. · Intelligence organizes knowledge using agreed upon rules for arrangements. · Temporal interactions cause earlier and later to be parameterized. Discrete intervals or continuous evolution produce varied action. · Energetic dependencies show up on scales of efficiency and can vary in their wait states making it possible to perform faster or slower. · Whenever we think materials, considerations from the realm of massive constraints are necessary. Sizing done when larger or smaller is effected, also durability, which is tested for strength and pliability, then utility with itz functionality, help demonstrate intelligent choices that were made by the producer. · Humans themselves occupy a category in the information theory simply because human consciousness thrives on information. The total intelligence of any human is directly related to her/his consumption of real information. · In supporting the final human unit, the truth of individual intelligence can be attested to by health and hygiene, emotions and comfort, knowledge and activity.
Knit Critique	SUMMARY
Has the language used, been normally distributed?	Summary. Within the so-called mental action base, the apriori methods are augmented with synthetic intelligence obtained through thorough analysis, reliable abstraction, and accurate testing. The expansion of the mental action base is driven by a synthesis of objects, their attributes and their many interactions, eventually obtaining real causes for their intersections shown by the same interactions. The drive for regular method should be sane and reasonable,
What about creativity? Artistry? Mental serendipity?	After word. Creativity may dominate in an expanding arena as legs of beliefs consisting of guesses, actual shortcuts, path derivations, and clever selections, all provided by an integral part of the brain called itz mind. We view the Mind as a conscious counterpart/companion, an evolving and growing conscious element to a silent partner. With creative skills, I usually can dub creativity as the compression of all information, knowledge and intelligence. What results is more information and we can call this creative information. When creative intelligence is used on this selected information obtaining any creative knowledge can still be expressed as information. More creative intelligence should then be derivable from this process that may transcend any believing system. I posit that one cannot create from intellectual space which exists outside of oneself, and if one cannot create from outside then one can only be creative from inside of oneself. This sort of entails that we can only create from the body of knowledge which exists in our heads. It seems odd that if creativity is simply a possession of the people and it is hard to find creativity in society then it means there is a lack of something in the head. This could be creative powers or it could be the body of knowledge existing in the head. Not very comforting if creativity is meaningful to you. I am wondering if anyone can argue that at the moment of creation the creative idea was not part of the mind. By this I mean the source of the idea, the determinism of the idea came from not (you). If you cannot argue the above, then you must necessarily allow me to speak of the information or knowledge that the creative idea used in its determination. This information and knowledge would have been in your brain and it was somehow singled out and manipulated so it could change its appearance and now show its true self as that created creative idea. Creativity then relates to how intelligence is used with knowledge. The creative capacity should show the extents to which humans will use their intelligence to make themselves more comfortable, healthier, and increase their knowledge. Individual human activities with personal hygiene will show creative skills in improving personal living conditions. Any intelligent thing done in the world manifests as facts always showing knowledge-in-itself. Intelligent changes made to the brain facilitating a better you, are unavailable for mental commentary but behavioral manifestations as actual demonstrations are acceptable forms of corroboration. Most facts can be expressed as a web of other facts, and infinite regression is avoided since the final/foundational facts at this time are based on legs of beliefs. Legs of beliefs are essentially summations inferred from observing discrete quantities under phenomenological action. Facts strongly portray specific finite forms of organization. The hierarchies space facts using volumes. A hierarchy is at least two webs of beliefs with legs between them. The legs of beliefs are the relations allowing us to move from one belief to the next as if they were cojoined. Any leg of belief will constrain which form the organization can take. The accidental or instinctive action does not count as originating from a knowledgeable source or for that fact a deployment through human intelligence. Accidents or instinctive action result from actions implicated by knowledge-in-itself.
Knit KNOWING	The KNITted vernacular - ITZ MEANING
Your know how.	Your capacity to demonstrate. Actions exemplifying phenomenological or analytical continuous functions over space-time. Like riding bicycles or doing Algebra.
Know how to...	Actual experiences of doing associated with the phenomenological, analytical or combined relations, existing as continuous functions over space-time.
Know how it was done.	Did it or something quite similar.
Know how it is done	Did it recently or something quite similar.
Know how it ...	Did it or something quite similar.
Know how to be	A continuous human disposition littered by discrete actions.
Know of/about	A way to claim superior information. Representative symmetry with discrete mathematical functions rather than continuous ones.
Know about it	Have information corresponding to... Itz veracity is produced by a discontinuous function.
Know about itz history.	- Was told about - Entangled with discrete functions.
Knowing about itz mistakes -	Learned about it...
To know about facts.	Exists; saw, read, heard, touched, smelled, all related to discrete clauses, all except living with yourself.
Know about ...	- Heard about, read about...
Know it	Real or imaginative stemming from the imagination being either continuous or discrete. Your acceptance of your own name. Pseudo-continuity allows itz familiarity.
Knew that ...	As a consequence of... Full moon on Tuesday.
Known...	A body of (active) knowledge, corresponding to either continuous or discrete mathematical representation.
Not known ...	Outside a body of knowledge.
Know why?	A pre-condition assisting with the impetus for a cause, that could turn out to be an intention acting as actions toward a directed effect, or an asymmetric web of asynchronous causes marked as consequential.
Knowing why phenomenologically?	The mental cognitive supporting state attained after finding/uncovering any or all initial casual physical conditions responsible for a belief/effect.
To know why through the scales of Justice.	Finding those synthetic mental initiatives driving thoughts into actions.
Knew your morality	As a consequence of physical apriori intelligence.
Knew your Ethics	Cognitive consequences due to synthetic intelligence.
BASE PROPOSITIONS	On Authority of/explanations
Proposition 1: An Analytical division exists between consciousness and the information theory supplying information.	An analytical as opposed to a physical division is proposed due to a lack of physical evidence although it seems reasonable to suspect the physicality of the human believing system. See also Proposition 22.
Proposition 2: Intelligence reflects improvements.	Only actions are noticeable in our world and only the best working actions from a set of suitably related causes are termed intelligent. See also Propositions 9, 12.
Proposition 3: Conscious of both real and imaginary things.	Due to the existence of both true beliefs and false beliefs, humans become aware of both real and imaginary aspects of life.
Proposition 4: Know about things by their regular names.	Knowing about objects involve learning, recognition and identification, allowing the referents of beliefs to be accessible by naming conventions.
Proposition 5: Primarily aware because of incoming information.	Aware because of the negation of blindness, implying a stream of incoming information.
Proposition 6: Information is transported into human consciousness.	Information is transported into consciousness using itz silent partners, them being occupied with signaling.
Proposition 7: Information undergoes mental changes adapting for human living.	Information undergoes changes in the head, making more information in the process needed for future stability.
Proposition 8a: Two action bases exist. (A) Mental. (B) Physical.	The existence of a phenomenological action base. See also Propositions 18, 19.
Proposition 8b: Two action bases exist. (A) Mental. (B) Physical.	The existence of a Mental action base based on an idea that my thinking (strategy) defines who I am. See also Propositions 10,25,26,27.
Proposition 9: Without action neither knowledge nor intelligence can be noticed/observed.	To show intelligence or to demonstrate any knowledge some action must be performed, in order that another may be informed to perform an assessment. See also Proposition 12.
Proposition 10: Existence of a mental action base.	A Mental Action base exists, one that activates and guides thinking, acting exactly along the lines of provision that the action bases behind the mechanics of our vast universe, starting with our own solar system, does. Je pense que je sois. There is something behind the thinking as something materially active. See also Propositions 25,26,27.
Proposition 11: IQ is related to human performance.	What humans call IQ which is suitably named Intelligence quotient, is related to human performance.
Proposition 12: After showing/using intelligence either knowledge or knowledge-in-itself comes into existence.	An exacting proposal describing the markers of intelligence as knowledge, accessible in the brain, available as fact, like a fine Vermeer, or knowledge-in-itself, manifesting as a fan. See also Propositions 2, 9.
Proposition 13: Knowledge-in-itself corresponds exactly to a fact operating under an action base, thought of as phenomenological.	A fanciful term, knowledge-in-itself, accounting for actual facts, as operating under the strictest terms of existence, corresponding to behaviors from the phenomenological action base.
Proposition 14: Knowledge is a justified true belief pertaining to facts.	Knowledge as a justified true belief, always found linked to facts in the material world and constrained by the current capacity of the natural phenomenological action bases, whose availability is limited only by entropy.
Proposition 15: Fiction is a justified true make-belief.	Fiction can be justified as a constructed belief, passed around in minds.
Propositions 16 & 17: Cause implies belief/effect. Web of causes imply belief/effect.	Using the deterministic cause implies effect, an ad hoc proposal for a web of asynchronous causes to imply a belief is set up in relief. A web of such causes can only trigger after enduring the maximum wait state (itz temporal width), dtj, for any of the causes within that web, and as such the temporal unit of effect, dt, cannot be less than dtj.
Propositions 18 & 19: Gravity, electric charge, light, heat, muscle and magnetism participate in the phenomenological action base. Energy, mass, space, time and the phenomenological action base hold primary importance for humans as life supporting phenomena.	Appeals to all those elements of nature that Scientists have discovered and have labeled them as essential and necessary. This includes gravity, electric charge, light, heat, muscle, and magnetism with their effects, which are energy, mass, space, and time.
Propositions 20 & 21: Thoughts report on the state of selected beliefs. Thoughts are the base beliefs of mental knowing.	I think therefore I am (Rene Descartes).
Proposition 22: Physical beliefs are the pivots for any intersection between consciousness and the new information theory.	An appeal to Human retention as an un-assailed persistence of memory.
Proposition 23:Signals, perception, data, information, knowledge, intelligence and creativity are the major analytical parts of the information theory	A self-referential appeal for consistency.
Proposition 24: The content of the physical believing system is given by the new Information theory (KNIT).	The analytical division between consciousness and itz information does exist, because without the phenomenological information flow described by this treatise mirroring reality; consciousness would be unlit, entangled in itself. By using the doubly deserving pivot, belief, the web of beliefs constructed from the external world, to represent the external world, does end up informing a human, making that human first aware then conscious, and as such, content is describable by this information theory.
Proposition 25: The Mental Action base is responsible for mental causation. Individual validity of an evolved mental action base is synthetic.	The existence of a mental brain based action base, using appropriate brain-hardware methods when giving content to specific thoughts, cannot be denied because of the continuous availability of that natural capacity. Additions to the human mental structure occurring over time can be seen as an evolution of it, and it is synthetic since it is learned. Falsification of any of the minor premises seems a cruel and inhuman fracture from being alive. See also Propositions 10,26,27.
Proposition 26: There exists a phenomenological action base supervening the mental action base that is genetic.	The existence of some phenomenologically based action base creating an appearance of a Mental action base, but delivering actual conscious results, cannot be denied because of our mental abilities. See also Propositions 10,25,27.
Proposition 27: The Mental Action base with itz apriori origins, and itz synthetic subsidiaries, consist of intelligence and creativity.	The Mental action base means intelligence and creativity, exemplifying methods, their applications and selections. Obtaining knowledge derived from phenomenological fact does reveal methods of operation that can be abstracted and taken up as intelligence. See also Propositions 10,25,26.
Knit roots	SOURCES & INSPIRATIONS
The Sixth Sense.	· Russell · Plotinus · Kant · Spinoza · Descartes · Rousseau · Sartre · Quine · Dennett · Chalmers · Minsky · Henry · Dyer · Knuth · Wallis · Big Blue · Born · Trefil · Einstein · Gel-Mann · Hawking · Milliken · a few others to be added
fin	end

This Information Theory was sponsored by WYCard Industries with itz CEO offering this edition as a Special Edition at 17:36 2009-01-19.

WYCard Industries 2010